Groqlegacybudget

Historical model (legacy). The rates below are the last recorded rates, not a recommendation for a new deployment.

Current price verification is unresolved or overdue. These are the last recorded rates; check the official source before budgeting. We do not relabel an old check with today's build date.

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct API Pricing

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct costs $0.11 per 1M input tokens and $0.34 per 1M output tokens. These rates were last verified on .

Published rates and billing units

Billing dimensionUSD list price
Input / 1M tokens$0.11
Output / 1M tokens$0.34

Verified 2026-08-12 · Official source · Pricing methodology. Taxes, optional services and account-specific discounts are not included.

Cost examples

These examples use published list prices only. They exclude taxes, enterprise discounts, minimum charges, retries, batch discounts, and provider-specific billing rules.

1M input + 1M output

$0.45

A direct per-million comparison against every other text model.

100K input + 25K output

$0.0195

A compact chat, summarization, or analysis workload.

10M input + 2M output

$1.78

A monthly production estimate for heavier RAG or agent traffic.

75% cached input + 250K output

Not listed

Groq does not publish a cached-input rate for this model in our dataset.

Calculator for Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Enter your own input, output, and cached-token assumptions. This calculator is preloaded with only Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct, so the result stays focused on this model.

Input cost

$0.11

Output cost

$0.34

Total

$0.45

Price history

No list-price movement across 187 daily snapshots from 2026-05-09 to 2026-11-11.

When to use Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct

Good fit

  • high-volume routing, classification, extraction, summaries, and fallback traffic

Be careful with

  • frontier reasoning or ambiguous tasks where failure is more expensive than token spend
  • decisions that depend on unpublished context-window limits without checking the provider docs first

Alternatives to compare