Google Geminilegacymid range

Historical model (legacy). The rates below are the last recorded rates, not a recommendation for a new deployment.

Current price verification is unresolved or overdue. These are the last recorded rates; check the official source before budgeting. We do not relabel an old check with today's build date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (>200k tokens) API Pricing

Gemini 2.5 Pro (>200k tokens) costs $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens. These rates were last verified on .

Published rates and billing units

Billing dimensionUSD list price
Input / 1M tokens$2.50
Cached input / 1M tokens$0.25
Output / 1M tokens$15.00

Verified 2026-08-12 · Official source · Pricing methodology. Taxes, optional services and account-specific discounts are not included.

Cost examples

These examples use published list prices only. They exclude taxes, enterprise discounts, minimum charges, retries, batch discounts, and provider-specific billing rules.

1M input + 1M output

$17.50

A direct per-million comparison against every other text model.

100K input + 25K output

$0.625

A compact chat, summarization, or analysis workload.

10M input + 2M output

$55.00

A monthly production estimate for heavier RAG or agent traffic.

75% cached input + 250K output

$4.56

Cached input is about 90% cheaper than standard input at list price.

Calculator for Gemini 2.5 Pro (>200k tokens)

Enter your own input, output, and cached-token assumptions. This calculator is preloaded with only Gemini 2.5 Pro (>200k tokens), so the result stays focused on this model.

Input cost

$2.50

Output cost

$15.00

Total

$17.50

Price history

No list-price movement across 202 daily snapshots from 2026-04-23 to 2026-11-11.

When to use Gemini 2.5 Pro (>200k tokens)

Good fit

  • reasoning-heavy prompts, planning, analysis, and multi-step tool use
  • high-volume routing, classification, extraction, summaries, and fallback traffic
  • long-document and repository-scale prompts where context window matters

Be careful with

  • blind migration without testing your own prompts, latency, and failure modes

Alternatives to compare