Affiliate disclosure: we may earn commissions when you sign up through some links below, at no extra cost to you. This never affects our pricing data, comparisons, or recommendations. Learn more.

AI Pricing Guru Labs · Direct API measurement

CogVideoX-3 API pricing: what each accepted video second actually cost

Our 2026-09-17 five-second test cost $0.0516 per accepted second; today's list price and API access are checked separately.

Current CogVideoX-3 list price and access versus historical measured cost
Current list price$0.20 / video
Price verified 2026-10-25
Measured accepted-second cost$0.0516
Historical 2026-09-17 run; not a new test
Documented duration / access5 or 10 seconds · direct API
Access verified 2026-10-25; separate from Coding Plan quota

Official list-price source · How we verify

8 direct API requests 2 matched prompts Text + image input Official pricing checked 2026-10-25

Buyer verdict

Our dated run cost about 29% above clean per-second math

For the historical 2026-09-17 run, the simple calculation was $0.20 ÷ 5 seconds = $0.0400 per second. The end-to-end run debited $1.60 for eight requests and yielded 31 accepted seconds, raising the observed rate to $0.0516. That is the more useful planning number for this tested workflow, not a universal CogVideoX-3 quality estimate.

Request success

87.5%

7 of 8 retrievable

Accepted seconds

31/40

77.5% end to end

Median generation

96.2s

Successful calls only

Effective cost

$0.0516

Per accepted second

Shared zero-based scale

Nominal price versus measured accepted-footage cost

Both bars use the same $0.00–$0.06 axis. The effective bar includes the billed but unretrievable request and rejected sampled seconds.

Nominal five-second math$0.0400
Measured cost per accepted second$0.0516
$0.00$0.03$0.06 per second

At this measured rate, 1,000 accepted seconds would cost about $51.61, versus $40.00 from list-price arithmetic alone.

Text versus image input

Image-to-video followed the prompts more reliably

ModeRetrievableAccepted secondsPrompt adherenceCost / accepted second
Text-to-video3/415/1533.3%$0.0533
Image-to-video4/416/2068.8%$0.0500

Pricing data: How we verify →

Do not overgeneralize. This was two product-ad prompts with two attempts per fixture/mode. The result supports a bounded buying insight—reference frames helped with exact text and directed motion here—not a universal ranking of CogVideoX-3 input modes.

Methodology

How we decided whether a second was usable

Fixture and grading contract

  • • Two matched product prompts: a NOVA bottle orbit and AURA headphones dolly.
  • • Four requirements per clip: stable product, specified object motion, camera move, and exact full-clip text overlay.
  • • One frame sampled at the midpoint of each requested second.
  • • A second was rejected for a severe geometry, continuity, duplication, or text artifact that made the footage unusable.

Limits

  • • Midpoint samples can miss brief inter-frame artifacts.
  • • One request was billed but could not be retrieved after its submission response was lost.
  • • Results apply to quality mode, 1280×720, 30 fps, five seconds, and no audio.
  • • Provider billing came from authenticated bonus-balance readings before and after the run.

Current API limits and billing boundary

  • Inputs: text-to-video, image-to-video, start-and-end-frame. Start/end frames support speed mode only.
  • Duration: 5 or 10 seconds (default 5); 30 or 60 fps; prompt limit 512 characters. Image uploads: png, jpeg, jpg, no more than 5M in provider wording.
  • Generation is asynchronous. Save the returned task ID, then poll for PROCESSING, SUCCESS, FAIL and the resulting video URL.
  • The Coding Plan is limited to supported tools and GLM-5.3 / GLM-5.3-Flash; do not treat its quota as video API credit.
  • The public price is per video; these sources do not enumerate separate duration, quality, resolution or audio tariffs. The per-second normalization here applies only to the tested five-second setup.
  • These reviewed sources do not specify a universal failed-request charge/refund rule. The billed unretrievable request is a historical observation, not a provider-wide policy.

Choose the workflow, not just the sticker price

Compare a multi-model video API before committing to one direct provider

This benchmark was run and billed through Z.ai. Check Novita's current image and video API catalog if you want a commercial multi-model alternative, then rerun the same acceptance test on the exact model you select. Novita was not the provider measured here, and its catalog should not be assumed to reproduce CogVideoX-3. AI Pricing Guru may earn a commission at no extra cost to you; it did not influence the benchmark.

For Z.ai text-model rates and the separate coding subscription, see our Z.ai pricing guide. The Coding Plan should not be treated as CogVideoX-3 API credit.

Sources and freshness

Current price verified ; API access verified 2026-10-25. Data owner: AI Pricing Guru Data. Re-verification cadence: daily. Benchmark measured 2026-09-17; these historical results have not been rerun. Official sources are monitored for price, duration, request-schema, and result-schema changes.